Monday, February 06, 2006

The three pillars of life

Indian philosophy as well as religion talks of three gunas Satva, Rajas and Tamas
Since I am hardly a scholar of Indian philosophy, this is my interpretation , this is not to be considered to be accurate, indeed it can be very much off the mark.

First comes Satva, Translated it can mean idea or trait positive in nature.
So what is positive? Here is my take Positive here means any ideal which affirms the life, what is more, the effect of positive force is the progress and elevation of life. This applies both for an individual as well as society. In short, Satva is anything which brings us closer to the truth.
This is the reason Hinduism placed emphasis on Bhakti and Jnan, this is also the reason that it is a folly to segregate Science and Religion. People whose ideals follow this, flourish.

Tamas is the opposite of Satva, it is negation of life, a rejection of all the values which nurture life, the animal instinct which cowers from holy fire, the fount of eternal light, the vehicle of civilization . The effects of negative force are civilizational decadence, spiritual bankruptcy followed by physical and material ruin, and destruction of civilization. That is why dogma is Tamas, that is why ignorance is Tamas. Any idea, any philosophy which dissuades from exploration of truth, either by making false claims of perfection or worse by claiming non existence of truth and therefore irrelevance of any such exploration.
Civilizations whose nature has become Taamsik either wither away or implode.

While Satva and Tamas reflect the opposing ideas, by themselves they have limited effect.

To be forceful, to hold sway, they need help of Rajas .
Rajas is the force, it is neutral, it is the enabler of the ideas.
In history where Rajas has been harnessed by Satva, it has meant a blossoming of vitality, it has meant the progress and elevation of civilization, to the stage where it's achievements has enthralled and humbled those who were to follow in it's wake.
Ancient Greece was one such civilization, so was Ancient India, so was Europe for brief period during and after enlightment.

However when it has allied itself to the Tamas, it wreaks destruction. It is the harbinger of ruin and death. Civilizations are plundered and the lofty ideals are pulled down from their pedestals.
,very foundations of enlightened civilization are disfigured.

It is important to recognize the importance of Rajas. The power of weapons wielded by Kshatriya is Raajsik, when it is used to defend dharama it affirm the positive force. When it is used for oppression, it affirms the negative.

2 comments:

froginthewell said...

As svAmi vivEkAnanda says ( I forget the exact quote ), though many Indians today might seem sAtvik are actually in tamas ( characterized by laziness etc. ). A person in true satva will not have laziness, will have no hesitation to keep working etc.

For Indians to reach satva from tamas we will have to go through rajas - i.e., first we will have to get rid of laziness and inertia. That is why he said that we ( as in most people, I suppose ) could be closer to the truth through football than the gIta.

This also relates to your previous post "We don't have true bhakti" - the thing is that what passes off as bhakti is mostly tamas, not satva.

I think this distinction is originally a sAn.khya concept.

Finally while I don't disagree with you here I think the distinction between these three is perhaps subtler that what has been described here. Perhaps reading the 14th chapter of the gIta, which is available here might help.

doubtinggaurav said...

Frog,

I am sure, it must be much more subtle than that.
It was just my initial attemp to understand the nature of thoughts.

Thanks for the link, I will persue it.

Regards