Apologia For Brahmins
Note I am not arguing that Brahmins have been perfect as a group, that is humanely impossible, or that the caste system is without imperfections. What I want, is to put role of Brahmins in context.
Firstly scriptures enjoin Brahmins to take vow of poverty nd subsist on Dakshina. This should refute charges of Brahmins enriching themselves by exploiting others.
Secondly scriptures do not vest Brahmins with any power to coerce others.
Thirdly historically Brahmins (like other castes) were in a economic contract with other castes on basis of client-patron relationship and hardly in a position to coerce their patrons.
Fourthly, (this is my speculation) Brahmins as a caste were chiefly not innovators but preserver of ancient customs hence caste system preceded them and scriptures such as Manusmriti merely encoded existing social customs.
Fifthly, the Shudras had rights, could possess property, and earn wealth with crafts and business. In reality Shudras were often prosperous and even ruled Kingdoms. Hence irrespective of scriptures (written in earlier era), Shudras were not deprived socially or economically.
Sixthly, The customs against "untouchables" regarding access to public space were indeed draconian, but those were due to concern for public hygiene. These customs have no place in modern world, but we are talking about a world without modern medicine, or amenities. Hence the concern is not out of place
