Tuesday, December 30, 2014

What is essence of Hinduism ?

What is essence of Hinduism ?

I don't think any two Hindus will agree, with that caveat in mind, I think following three mantras capture the essence

1. Metaphysics/Philosophy: अहं ब्रह्म अस्मि (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aham_Brahmasmi)
2. Ethics/Morality: धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितःhttp://www1.avsrinivasan.com/hindu/dharmo_rakshati.html
3. Individual: कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते मा फलेषु कदाचन... http://www.swamivivekanandaquotes.org/2014/05/bhagavad-gita-chapter-2-verse-47.html

Rebooting Hindutva

Disclaimer 1: While as a cultural nationalist, I am very much interested in resurgence of India & Hinduism (both being inseparable in my view). The topic is too vast for a single post, as well as too complicated for a single person.

Disclaimer 2: When I say Hindutva, I do not refer to original theory propounded by Savarkar, having never read, but on Hindutva, the political movement, which accompanied Ram Janam Bhoomi movement in 80's 


Note: Throughout the post, whenever I use "we", "us" it is for cultural nationalists.



A Clear Eyed Assessment Of Hindutva

Where we are

In the wake of Narendra Modi's convincing victory, it's easy for us to be complacent, that is why it is a sobering realization that this victory was not about Hindutva, hell it was not even about Nationalism, cultural or otherwise. It was, to cut a long story short, about acche din.

In fact why just stop at this election. Hindutva (again not referring to Savarkar, but the popular movement) has not scaled well. After its decimation in 1984 BJP was resurrected by Hindutva, not only getting most number of electoral support till then in its history (incl its previous avatar as BJS), but also becoming the focal point around which politics contours will take shape. 

That however changed after demolition of Disputed structure in 1992, while BJP did try to revive the movement both locally in UP and nationally, but could never regain the earlier traction, that along with difficulty in attracting allies (as well as hostile secular-establishment) ensured BJP put it in backburner.

All of this is a repeat of what I wrote in the immediate aftermath of BJP's defeat in 2009 elections. (If it is any comfort, these elections are not a mandate for Center-Right either)

Be that as it may, it doesn't leave us at enviable position. A deceptive ascendancy and frail majority after continued hegemony of sec-lib establishment, (with ABV government nary a intervening blip), we are in state of disorientation, both electorally as well as intellectually.

Electorally, for while there still is a core constituency for Hindutva (however, vaguely defined and understood) it is, at best marginal  In fact, if we can afford to be candid to ourselves for a moment, as far are electoral calculations are concerned, not only we might be irrelevant for large swathes of electoral map, we might also be at disadvantage due to "secular" polarization

Beyond the core constituency of course we have a broad spectrum of sympathisers, however for them Hindutva is seldom the first priority, further antics of Hindutva organizations (vandalism & violence) frequently alienate even the sympathisers.

Related to this (even if not apparent) is question of our intellectual bearings. What does contemporary Hindutva stand for ? 370 UCC, Ram Mandir ? Is there nothing more to Hindutva?

At risk of earning ire of fellow Hindutva Vadis, let me suggest, Hindutva as it exists at presents is not much more than a confused cacophony of slogans. It is true that there is real passion behind slogans, but in absence of direction, the passion will degenerate into lumpen behavior.

And then there is question of elections. We can't persuade voters to our side, if our side doesn't have any message or if we ourselves are confused.

Hindutva, could and should, be more than that. This post and this blogger are hardly the right medium to do justice to such a humongous project. However let me suggest that at the least Hindutva should be a civilizational project, meant to rejuvenate our atrophied motherland.

With that context, here is what I think should guide evolution of Hindutva.

1. Independence from Government - I am no doctrinarian libertarian, however there are valid reasons to be wary of government interference,  both general (corruption in proximity of power) and specific (the more we empower government in religious matters, the more likely it is that it will be used by sec-lib establishment to undermine Hinduism and Hindu Dharma )

2. Creation Of Institutions - We must build institutions to support and nurture Hindu Dharma through, documentation, instruction, dissemination, discussion and ideation. These institutions can be conventional as well as unconventional.

3 Creation Of Ecosystem - The institutions created should aim to be as comprehensible as possible wrt all the facets of civilizational project such as spirituality, history, politics, civics, philosophy etc through interdisciplinary exchange.

4. Cultivation of  knowledgeable and motivated supporter. Who can engage and contribute meaningfully in this project.

5. Integration with the existing social institutions, networks and frameworks. We might not know what Hindutva is at this point, but we know what it is not It is not an attempt to recreate the civilization from scratch or upend the existing order for some utopian scheme. Rather it is an attempt to gradually and incrementally heal, nourish and strengthen our motherland.

6. Securing the capital to finance- Last but not the least, such a civilizational effort will need considerable amount of capital to sustain, which is only possible if we also have businessmen and traders, industrialists and financiers onboard this project.

To reiterate what I said few days back on twitter.

"Along with Chatrapati Shivaji, we also need Samarth Guru Ramdas, along with Maharana Pratap, we also need Bhama Shah"

To be continued...

Saturday, December 27, 2014

[Short Post]: Gnosticism Of Centre Right

Note: This is supposed to be a short post intended to be answer to question I posed on twitter

Also, my previous posts on "centre right" [1] [2]

Related [1]

I think it can be said incontrovertibly that last decade has witnessed an explosive growth in, for lack of better words, centre-right movement, both in terms of online supporters as well as emerging ideational-discursive ecosystem (something I predicted in passing in one of my earlier posts )

Now it shouldn't surprise anyone that I am not exactly enamoured with this "libertarian-lite" movement. There are multiple reasons for that (which also explain its popularity), however the fundamental error, from which all others emanate, is that of gnosticism.

Gnosticism is a collection of somewhat related religious doctrines, developed alongside Christianity, whose distinctive feature was extreme rejection of material, sensual world which was considered evil and false, having created by demiurge, and a single minded embracement of spiritual world considered pure and true.

It is my contention that Centre-right movement also suffers from gnostic vision, except instead of spirituality, its proponents consider abstract thought and sterile rationality, uncontaminated by all the incertitudes and irrationality and passion of human condition, to be pure and true, and hence end goal of their intellectual interrogation. Seduced by siren songs of intellectual certitudes, they lose sight of their end-goal, essentially reversing it, which is proving intellectual scaffolding for eudaimonia with its crooked timber and all.

In that they come dangerously close to how Nietzsche described Christianity 

To be charitable to centre-right movement, this gnostic vision may not be peculiar to it but to any intellectual endeavor. The only difference between a drunkard and intellectual is that while drunkard looks for the keys lost in dark under the lamppost, the intellectual insists that the keys should have been lost under the lamppost.


Friday, December 26, 2014

A Christmas Metaphor

On the festival formerly known as Saturnalia/Yule, an interesting (or not) observation.

Isaac Asimov in short story, "Little Lost Robot", introduced Nestor series of robot. These robots in addition to being "three laws" compliant, had the ability to detect gamma radiation.

This is the basic setup which drives the story. Nestor robots, bound by first law ("A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm."), persistently try to save the scientists working with gamma radiation, even though the working scientists are at no point ever in danger (more than adequate safeguards, gamma radiation itself being mild etc). Since first law is absolute and gives no leeway for safeguards or human judgement, the robots have no option but to drag away the scientists from their experiment, literally stalling the project. In short, they were great pain in the unmentionables.

This has uncanny similarity with Christianity. According to Christian theology, all humans are afflicted by original sin, and as such destined for eternal torment of hell. Luckily for us, Jesus Christ, son of God, God in human form, sacrificed himself for our sins. As such it is duty of every Christian to bring heathens to light of Jesus and save their eternal souls. If this annoys the heathens or disrupts their (Satanic) customs, then (for Christians) it is but a small price to pay for their salvation.

And that is why neo-Christians who have consciously accepted Christian theology (unlike cultural Christians, for whom it is just part and parcel of inherited culture) , are usually such pain in the ass.