Aphorism: One mistake that people often make...
Is assuming that merely having anomalous genes is sufficient to make someone a philosopher, whereas one must also be in miserable marriage and have a horrible domestic life inflicted upon, to act as trigger for those genes.
9 comments:
Are you married? If no... save it for later. If yes, i would have no choice but to agree with you as being the exception you prove the rule.
Cinamon,
So you agree or disagree
I dont have the genes so no personal knowledge. But looking at my father and *him* who is still single, Id say i disagree.
Cinamon,
Is your father a philosopher ?
Yes, and a happily married man too :).
Cinamon,
I am never wrong. May be your father is philatelist or philanthropist, just asking.
Neither. He is happily married and a philosopher and another man in my life is single and philosopher.
You could either change your sample size of the sampling method coz i feel your results are skewed.
Cinamon,
You are taking all fun out of being miserable :-)
i am sorry young man but thats the way it is. Maybe you shud get married... the lady am sure will prove me worng (she will have all the desired components). :P.
Post a Comment