Why I am not liberal (in one line)
Liberalism means dismantling society, I dont want society to be dismantled, hence I am not liberal.
Liberalism means dismantling society, I dont want society to be dismantled, hence I am not liberal.
(AI assisted)
General Category is protesting online for equality. BJP is ignoring the protest, their logic being, that GCs have no alternative, that, if GCs dont vote for BJP, GCs will suffer. But that argument goes both way, if GCs dont vote for BJP, GCs will suffer, but so will BJP.
This closely mirrors cold war doctrine regarding nuclear arsenal. The idea was, if either of USA and Russia initiates nuclear attack, the retaliation by other part will ensure, mutual destruction.
This doctrine is known as MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction). This doctrine ensured stability between both camps of cold war, close to 4 decades. This can just work for GCs as well.
Capitalism has ensured that common man has easy access to the most refined art, at the same time capitalism has also ensured that common man aspires for nothing but basest of desires
The principal aim of any system of political economy is to sustain surplus production of society.
A reformist is reformist because reform makes him feel good about himself.
But he can be reformist only as long as there is something to reform
Hence it follows that he will keep finding something wrong to reform.
This explains the entire gamut of Indian politics from Communists to Sangh
1. Core premise of enlightenment liberalism is that man is inherently good and left to own device will arrive at virtue.
2. From above liberalism argue for *absolute* free speech.
3. In reality man is flawed & left to own device will fall to wickedness
4. Reason alone can't guide man towards virtue. Reason must be anchored to a premise which in itself is beyond reason
5. For various philosophical reasons involving ontology, deontology etc, belief in deity is the most parsimonious version of premise
6. Therefore average man remains steadfast to virtue to the extent he retains belief in deity and associated theology.
7. Insofar social contract is concerned with virtuous conduct, deity is lynchpin to social contract
8. Man believes in deity only to the extent there is awe and fear surrounding deity
9. Once man stops fearing deity, he stops believing in deity, without belief social contract collapses and with it society.
10. Therefore blasphemy laws are necessary for society QED.
Internet Hindus dont understand nature of Indian state. Indian state is inheritor of Dark regime (Islamic rule + British Raj), which claimed legitimacy to rule on basis of bringing light of civilization to Hindus living in darkness of superstition and ignorance.
Mission of Indian state is same, ie to bring light of civilization (essentially latest intellectual fad of west) to Hindus. Doenst matter which branch of state, judiciary, legislature or executive, function under the same ideological framework.
Modi, being quintessentially Sanghi, lacks any original insight and therefore follows same ideological status quo.
Argument behind free speech absolutism is "marketplace of ideas" which hinges on premise "good ideas will drive away bad ideas" which hinges on premise market is an institution driven by reason.
Reality is opposite, market is driven by sentiments which is why bad ideas drive out good ideas.
QED
Ideological movements are driven by autistic and screwed by autistic.
Basically you need a Goldilocks zone of autism for ideological movement to thrive.
When is man happy?
When he acts according to Dharma.
What is Dharma?
Divine law, progressively revealed in nature.
Indian constitution enshrines secularism as state ideology. Secularism elide self-enemy distinction. Indian constitution is a suicide pact for Hindus
1. Existence of society is based on social contract.
2. Social contract, being ideological artifact is susceptible to bad ideas.
3. Many bad ideas are contagious
This defines the limit of free speech.
Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau got social contract wrong.
By now, it should be obvious to everyone that Indian politics has entered spiral of competitive populism.
This not a good news. Here is my proposal to curb it
1. There should be a legal limit for deficit for state budgets (already covered by FRBM act)
2. There should be a nonpartisan agency (like CBO https://cbo.gov) which evaluates manifesto to reconcile with budget. Only approved ones can be announced in polls