(Hindu) Life Under Secularism

In 1984, George Orwell described life under totalitarianism in following words ,

"If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.

For me, that's the most vivid and most terrifying descriptor of Hindu future under Secularism. Beneath its mind stultifying platitudes, it is totalitarian in nature. Lib-sec establishment has a single aim, which it pursues ruthlessly and relentlessly. It aims for nothing less than obliteration of Hindu conscious, and for this, it will keep stomping on any and all markers of Hindu life, our history, our tradition, our faith and philosophy, until Hindu identity is pulverized and reverted to a primordial state out of which a new man can be created.

And they will not stop

Why They Hate Narendra Modi

A brief post this

Oldtimer's post on Modi-baiters has reminded me of a point I have been meaning to make since quite sometime, the visceral hatred for Narendra Modi. This hatred, I used to think was analogous to two minute hate, in this scenario NaMo is to lib-sec establishment, what Emmanuel Goldstein was to the party in 1984.
.
However lately I have revised my opinion. While it is not clear whether Emmanuel Goldstein exists (indeed in 1984 it is strongly hinted at the end that he is fictitious), however it is clear within the novel that even he exists he and his organization are an ineffectual resistance against party, either in physical terms or in propaganda, we know this because Winston Smith, the protagonist,  never indicates any presence of Goldstein beyond two minute hate. From this, I think it is safe to conclude that only purpose Goldstein was mentioned at all by Party was to divert and release desperation and anger of public at their wretchedness.

Now in part, lib-sec est does invoke NaMo to consolidate Muslims against Hindus, however there is a crucial difference. Unlike Goldstein, NaMo is a formidable opponent. He has captured the imagination of aspirational middle class against craven venality of a cruel yet buffoonish establishment. He holds the promise, however feeble, of upending cozy consensus of Delhi Durbar, of the false consensus forced upon India by a self loathing and incestuous intelligentsia.

And this is why they hate NaMo because they are afraid that he can't be bought, and that he can snatch the one thing they covet most, the power to maipulate the will.