Adieu Dharam Singh
From news reports, it seems likely that Congress will be biting the dust.
I am ofcourse happy, because the developments will result in BJP occupying power for the first time in South India, ironically (may be not) with the help of a secular party. This will ofcourse give serious heart attacks to secular deities , which I always consider a good thing.
However seriously speaking, what I would like to see is Bangalore come out from the present mess. I have never lived in Bangalore (only time I went was for three days) and whatever I hear about present problems in either through media or through friends. But I hold Bangalore dear, the reason , it represents what India is capable of. I admit that present expansion puts a serious constraint on the city causing resentment in long time residents. But I will prefer present day Banglore over the past anyday. I do not measure Banglore by the pubs (I am a tee - totaller) or disco (I hate loud music), but by the hope , confidence and aspirations of the present generation.
For this reason Banglore is to be cherished and provided all the ways to flourish.
I will try to write a post about it later.
Will BJP be able to stem the rot ? I hope so. But I have no knowledge of the Karnatak politics.
Addendum : This has an interesting implication ofcourse, to make you recollect how Sonia Gandhi did not bother to give Deve Gowda time of day when he wanted to meet her.
That means that Sonia Gandhi is arrogant like her mother-in-law, but unlike her MIL she is a dolt.
With less than 150 members, she is acting like Caesar (or rather Tzarina)
Although English media will prefer to tell how she is a changed person from that tea party of 1998, and is almost a combination of blessed virgin and sita (it is ridiculous but nobody can blame media for being sensible).
May be it is a set up before she falls hard, may be God does have a plan
2 comments:
Giving unto Caesar…
Sandhya Jain
The Pioneer
January 24, 2006
The mills of god grind slowly, but they grind exceedingly fine. The Bible says their inexorable grinding brings the most arrogant offenders to justice. As several high profile accused in the Bofors kickbacks scandal slip through the butterfingers of a tardy investigative system and a conniving polity, Sonia Gandhi may yet emerge as the sole victim of the whole sordid affair. Never directly accused of corruption, yet insidiously insinuated in every deal struck by fellow Italian Ottavio Quattrocchi since she entered the household of the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi now stands in danger of being indicted at the bar of public opinion as an accessory to crimes linked with the her Roman countryman.
Her stubborn silence in the face of a national furore over signor Quattrocchi making off with nearly Rs. 21 crores from surreptitiously released bank accounts in London, which were frozen after he was identified in legal documents as a recipient of the Bofors illicit payoff, reinforces her image as a sinister manipulator of the Indian political and legal system. Regardless of rhetoric churned out by the Congress president’s spin doctors, few will believe she had no hand in the sudden move by the UPA government to give the Italian a clean chit before Britain’s Crown Prosecution Service, resulting in the speedy de-freezing of his bank accounts and his prompt denudation of the same.
Quattrocchi’s apparent triumph in thus recovering his moolah has had a demoralizing effect upon Indian public opinion, and many commentators have tacitly endorsed the view that the case is as good as over. Yet I believe that the underhand manner in which the former Snam Progetti employee was given a clean chit by Union Law Minister H.R. Bhardwaj and facilitated in recovering his ill-gotten gains has brought the Bofors smoking gun directly to Sonia Gandhi’s door. In the lifetime of the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, few opposition leaders felt it manly to link his wife with kickbacks associated with lucrative foreign deals. Thus, even as her dour, unsmiling visage cast huge shadows over his political career and personal credibility, Sonia escaped public odium because he insulated her from direct scrutiny.
Of course, no one knew then that a fellow Roman had been entrusted with the collection of nearly a third of the Rs. 64 crore payoff. That revelation came during the tenure of Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao, who was sufficiently intimidated by the signora to permit Quattrocchi to escape to Kuala Lumpur, even as pressure mounted for impounding his passport and arresting him in the case. Interpol issued a red alert for the Roman, who publicly blackmails the Congress president by proclaiming his intimate ties with her family even as she pretends amnesia, and Malaysia was considering India’s request for extradition when a Single Judge gave a highly questionable judgment on a Friday, enabling Quattrochi to flee before an appeal could be filed on Monday and a stay obtained against his departure.
Now, a similar deliberate confusion of legal process has enabled him to grab monies identified with the Bofors kickbacks. Since the sole purpose of the obfuscation in London was to help him get (and perhaps share) this money, it is unlikely that the UPA regime will press Interpol to deliver this personal friend of its supreme leader to stand trial in the Bofors bribery case. Yet the Indian people have the right to know why a friendly European country has failed to respect the Interpol alert and arrest Quattrochi. Mr. George Fernandes has pointedly asked Ms. Gandhi why she does not ask her friend to return to India and clear his name, and her sullen silence only aggravates her complicity.
Sonia Gandhi has denied herself the fig-leaf of being a housewife who is being unfairly targeted by opposition leaders on account of her foreign origins. After playing a cat and mouse game with the late Narasimha Rao, she grabbed power in the Congress in a tasteless, un-Indian-style coup against the late Sitaram Kesri; her acolytes roughed up senior leaders likely to resist her ascension. Today she is the Congress president, a sitting MP from Rai Bareilly, and UPA chairperson – in short, a complete political animal.
Since it was Sonia who introduced Quattrocchi to the household of both Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi, she personally owes the nation an explanation why Swedish arms manufacturer AB Bofors paid the Roman to swing the gun deal via AE Services, which transferred the funds to Swiss bank accounts operated by Quattrocchi and his wife, Maria. Not only was Quattrocchi then an Italian public sector employee, but he entered the picture literally at the last moment, and promptly put the French gun Sofma out of the way. A front company called AE Services signed a contract with Bofors in November 1985 stipulating a three percent commission if the contract was signed before March 31, 1986, as indeed it was.
This commission moved in and out of several bank accounts to conceal its origins with AB Bofors, but dogged Indian investigators followed the bank trail and linked the funds with the Quattrocchis, prompting them to flee the country. The tangible links between Quattrocchi and the Bofors money, and between the Italian and the Gandhi family, may have led Sonia Gandhi to believe that helping him to get the money would both silence him and put the case in permanent cold storage. As if on cue, sponsored voices in the media began claiming that the Bofors investigation has cost the nation more money than the bribes paid, and that larger scandals have surfaced since, and hence the case should be closed.
In response, the Supreme Court has taken the view that if the Centre and the CBI felt that pending cases against Quattrocchi should be dropped, they “should have gone to the criminal court (where the trial is pending),” a virtual stricture against the UPA regime and its de facto supremo. The CBI’s belated claim that it sent additional solicitor general B. Datta to London without the knowledge of the Law Ministry or the Department of Personnel and Training (headed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh), is a post-dated cheque on a failed bank.
Dr. Singh has done well to dissociate himself from the de-freezing of Quattrocchi’s London accounts. To the extent that he can be considered complicit in the affair, it is as a subject who has given the demanded dues to the Congress Caesar. In short, whichever way one looks at the London chapter of the scandal, the inescapable conclusion is that Sonia Gandhi has incriminated herself and given substance to the belief that naturalized citizens should be debarred from positions of political responsibility, and certainly from constitutional posts. Not only is their loyalty suspect, but the gamut of their personal associations can never be fully known, thus leaving ample space for external manipulation.
Media savvy acolytes of the Congress president complain that she has revived a defunct scandal and undone the painstaking work of the spin doctors who whitewashed the fact that her foreign origins checkmated her prime ministerial ambitions in 2004, and projected her as the epitome of self-sacrifice. Bofors may affect Rahul Gandhi’s proposed elevation in the party, but the more lasting effect will be a hardening of attitudes among coalition partners.
Cool blog, interesting information... Keep it UP Advance cash loans pay day short term gakhan and yasmin hotel free vids porn Microfiber shoulder bag Ohio cellular phone repair free craps online Westcon callcenter models celebrities Lunix compatible harddrives Olathe used hot tubs adipex
Post a Comment