This is plagiarised....

This is plagiarised, I don't know from where but it is. Can you, gentle reader, imagine street car having humour, or not being lame ? Heck, he even managed to think up of a pun (dhoti bomb, get it dhoti bomb). The case is as open and shut as it can be. He is lifting the stuff from somewhere, or he is smoking the stuff he should not be smoking. Whatever it is, I will find it. Blogging may suffer, but at this point blogging doesn't matter at all, truth must prevail. May Jagadguru give me the power.

Note to his eminence

Atheism comes in two flavour, strong and weak.

I admit these categories don't make that much of a sense to me, but nevertheless these categories do exist.

Speaking of things that do not make sense to me, why is his eminence so riled anyway. His "unbelief" shaken lately ? Reader(s) kindly illuminate.

Arun Shourie For PM

Arun Shourie depresses, which is why his works don't go well with viral fever.

That aside, what is wrong with having Arun Shourie as PM ? He for one, has more guts than present disgrace, and I don't think anyone can doubt his integrity.

Ofcourse he is not secular enough, but secularism is over-rated anyway.

Update: Of course whom a blogger supports is inconsequential as is the blogger. But isn't blogging about fun n feeling ?

Intervention

I find granularity interesting. How well a system works is dependant on how granular it is. Typically there is optimum limit for granularity. A system too-coarse or too-fine grained, will not give the desired output, in worst cases it may even crash.
To decide granularity, theory and even observations are of limited help. Right size, is a question of instinct, a gut feeling so as to say.

A crucial answer

As I have confessed don't I am not exactly an expert on American politics. However I am ardent bhakta of Jagadguru, and by his inspiration, I can now answer who is the right candidate to vote.
First let me explain the criteria, in times of Jefferson candidates were decided by the principles and political maneuvering. However in a post Web 2.0 world the candidacy must be decided by pillow fights between girls in their underwear.

Now based on that enlightened principle, I present the three videos.

Video [1]
Video [2]
Video [3]

Now all of them have their merits. But religiously adhering to TIT analysis, I have come to conclusion that Hillary Auntie is the best candidate.

Reason 1. Lesbian overtone of the video, showing the progressive and inclusive side.

Reason 2. French Maid, guys ! How can any male not covet what is kinky.

A crucial question.

The last post brought up something which I have been meaning to ask y'all.

Now I think you will agree that The Talented Mr Pai loves his mango.
Also without doubt he is much more eligible than Matt Damon or Chris Gaines.

So the question is, will he be able to win over Mango. Or horror, even he can't have the mango !
Oh, to be Mangao !


Watch the clip below carefully, do some TIT (Thinking it through) analysis, and answer.

How not to tackle terrorism

As a Hindutva fascist thug it is most distressing for me to directly contradict fellow thug (and also RC), but in this case one can not but agree with Talented Mr Pai.[*]


However first let me point out the issue involved here. Yes apology by Australia to Haneef would be nice. Also since Haneef had Indian passport, same thing holds for Indian government.


But apology to Haneef or Indian government is not the main issue here. Main issue remain fairness and appearance of it. State has monopoly over use of force. If state wishes, and if it is within law, it can restrict freedom, or incarcerate citizens. This monopoly means that this power should always be discharged fairly and any hint of political vendetta, or worse cover up should never arise. Sure for terrorism we may have to enact restrictive or intrusive laws, but the conduct should always be above board, and motive beyond accusation.

Unfortunately fair conduct has been sorely missing from this incident. There is no question that considering the circumstances, sudden departure of Haneef was highly suspicious. However the investigation was bungled, to say the least, and from evidence gathering, the whole focus shifted to cover up and scoring political points. This is a real big egg in face.

The purpose of this is not merely to expound on conduct of state, there is a relevant aspect to it. Islamic terrorism is less of a physical war and more of information war. Those fighting terrorism are hampered by the denial and falsification of bleeding heart liberalism. In order to maintain narrative of multiculturalism and moral equivalence (from which the liberalism derive sustenance and authority) , liberals are trying their utmost to confound the situation. Incidences like above are nothing but a weapon in liberal propaganda. Such occurrence must be prevented from happening.

PS. Note I am not arguing that this will alienate Muslims. I have come to believe that Muslim intellectuals (radicals and so called moderates alike) are too enamoured with this narrative of victimization at hands of West/Christian/Jew/Hindu, that nothing others can do, is going to appease their demands or redress the grievance.